Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:35821/feed
General
Vol. 22, Issue 2, 2015January 01, 2015 EDT

Slide to Unlock: Apple-Samsung, Alice, and the Need for Clarity in Assessing Patent-Eligibility Under Section 101 for Touchscreen Software Patents

Tucker J. McKinley,
Alice Corp.v. CLS BankApple v. SamsungsmartphonestouchscreeniPhoneSamsungAppleslide-to-unlockpatents'721 patentinventive conceptMOT testmachine-or-transformation
Journal of Intellectual Property
Tucker J. McKinley, Slide to Unlock: Apple-Samsung, Alice, and the Need for Clarity in Assessing Patent-Eligibility Under Section 101 for Touchscreen Software Patents, 22 Journal of Intellectual Property 411 (2015).

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

cookies
cookies
cookies
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system