This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:11493/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 21, Issue 2, 2014January 01, 2014 EDT

Novartis Ag v. Union of India: “Evergreening,” Trips, and “Enhanced Efficacy” Under Section 3(d)

Dorothy Du,
Novartis AG v. Union of Indiapharmaceutical industrysecondary patentsIndian Patent ActsevergreeningTrade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property RightsTRIPSWorld Trade OrganizationIntellectual Property Appellate Boardimatinib mesylateinventive stepnoveltyenhanced efficacydoctrine of inherent anticipationdouble patentingprior art
Journal of Intellectual Property
Dorothy Du, Novartis Ag v. Union of India: “Evergreening,” Trips, and “Enhanced Efficacy” Under Section 3(d), 21 Journal of Intellectual Property 223 (2014).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system