This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16808/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 16, Issue 2, 2009January 01, 2009 EDT

On Abstraction and Equivalence in Software Patent Doctrine: A Response to Bessen, Meurer and Klemens

Andrew Chin, Journal of Intellectual Property,
BessenMeurerKlemensIn re BilskiPatent ActEnd Software Patents ProjectChurch-Turing thesispolynomial-time algorithmsNP-completenesspolynomial-time reductionslinear programmingmathematical programmingnonlinear programming problemmethods and apparatus for efficient resource allocation
Journal of Intellectual Property
Andrew Chin & Journal of Intellectual Property, On Abstraction and Equivalence in Software Patent Doctrine: A Response to Bessen, Meurer and Klemens, 16 Journal of Intellectual Property 197 (2009).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system