This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:30210/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2010January 01, 2010 EDT

Confusion Codified: Why Trademark Remedies Make No Sense

Mark A Thurmon, Journal of Intellectual Property,
trademarkLanham ActcopyrightCopyright ActFederal Trademark Act of 1946Sandforth's CaseHogg v. KirbyLord Cairn's ActMishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S.S. Kresge Co.Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.L.P. LarsonJr.Co. v. Wm. WrigleyJr.Co.Metcalf Rectanus
Journal of Intellectual Property
Mark A Thurmon & Journal of Intellectual Property, Confusion Codified: Why Trademark Remedies Make No Sense, 17 Journal of Intellectual Property 245 (2010).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system