P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 13, Issue 2, 2006January 01, 2006 EDT
Patent Drafter Estoppel: Why Didn’t Sage Products Create a New Foreseeability Limitation on the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents?
Patent Drafter Estoppel: Why Didn’t Sage Products Create a New Foreseeability Limitation on the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents?
Christopher M. Kaiser, Journal of Intellectual Property,
Doctrine of equivalentssage products v. devonpatent drafter estoppelGraver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Line Air Prods. Co.function-way-resultdoctrine of prosecution history estoppelJohnson & Johnston Assocs. v. R.E. Serv. Co.Vehicular Technologies Corp. v. Titan Wheel InternationalInc.overhead door corp. v. the chamberlain groupinc.sciMed Life systemsinc. v. advanced cardiovascular systemsinc.
Christopher M. Kaiser & Journal of Intellectual Property, Patent Drafter Estoppel: Why Didn’t Sage Products Create a New Foreseeability Limitation on the Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents?, 13 Journal of Intellectual Property 305 (2006).