P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004January 01, 2004 EDT
When a Promise is not a Promise: Georgia’s Law on Non-compete Agreements, as Interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit in Keener v. Convergys Corporation, Gives Rise to Comity and Federalism Concerns
When a Promise is not a Promise: Georgia’s Law on Non-compete Agreements, as Interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit in Keener v. Convergys Corporation, Gives Rise to Comity and Federalism Concerns
Christopher D. David,
Keener v. Convergys Corporationtrade secretsnon-disclosure agreementsemploymentnon-competePrivileges and Immunities ClauseDormant Commerce ClauseGeorgia
Christopher D. David, When a Promise Is Not a Promise: Georgia’s Law on Non-Compete Agreements, as Interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit in Keener v. Convergys Corporation, Gives Rise to Comity and Federalism Concerns, 11 Journal of Intellectual Property 395 (2004).