This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:21394/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004January 01, 2004 EDT

“Every Artist is a Cannibal, Every Poet is a Thief”: Why the Supreme Court was Right to Reverse the Ninth Circuit in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.

Joshua K. Simko, Journal of Intellectual Property,
trademarkinfringementlikelihood of confusionLanham ActcopyrightDastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.public domainIntellectual Property Clause
Journal of Intellectual Property
Joshua K. Simko & Journal of Intellectual Property, “Every Artist Is a Cannibal, Every Poet Is a Thief”: Why the Supreme Court Was Right to Reverse the Ninth Circuit in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 11 Journal of Intellectual Property 355 (2004).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system