This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Journal of Intellectual Property
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • General
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:11493/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 1996January 01, 1996 EDT

Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp.

Ashley H. Draughon,
§ 43(a) of the Lanham Actcommercial advertising or promotionGarland Co. v. Ecology Roof Sys. Corp.false and misleading representations
Journal of Intellectual Property
Ashley H. Draughon, Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp., 3 Journal of Intellectual Property 353 (1996).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system