Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2016January 01, 2016 EDT
Discouraging Frivolous Copyright Infringement Claims: Fee Shifting under Rule 11 or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 as an Alternative to Awarding Attorney’s Fees under Section 505 of the Copyright Act
Discouraging Frivolous Copyright Infringement Claims: Fee Shifting under Rule 11 or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 as an Alternative to Awarding Attorney’s Fees under Section 505 of the Copyright Act
David E. Shipley, Journal of Intellectual Property,
attorney's feesRule 11Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & SonsCopyright Actcopyright infringementfrivolous claimintellectual propertycivil proceduresanctionsfee shiftingbad faithSection 192717 U.S.C. §505
David E. Shipley & Journal of Intellectual Property, Discouraging Frivolous Copyright Infringement Claims: Fee Shifting under Rule 11 or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 as an Alternative to Awarding Attorney’s Fees under Section 505 of the Copyright Act, 24 Journal of Intellectual Property 33 (2016).